Rental property proposal has landlords concerned
Mt. Lebanon officials are seeking public input on a plan to register all rental properties and conduct more frequent inspections, and they may get an earful from landlords who think it will be a burden.
The board of commissioners will hold a public hearing and possibly vote Feb. 25 on the proposal, which would require all rented apartments, townhouses, duplexes and condominiums to be registered with the municipality, inspected for compliance with local building codes and re-inspected every three years or whenever a tenant moves out.
“We have several thousand apartment units in Mt. Lebanon, many of which are over 40 years old and in need of regular maintenance,” said Mt. Lebanon Manager Steve Feller. “This will make sure they get that maintenance.”
Chief Inspector Joe Berkley said the inspections would give landlords a tool to hold tenants responsible for things they break around their apartments: if a landlord has a clean inspection showing all the electrical outlets and plumbing in working order, it's harder for a tenant to claim the landlord was responsible for something they broke, Berkley said.
But landlord Casey Steiner, of Edgewood-based Steiner Realty, said the program was “a solution in search of a problem.”
The Mt. Lebanon Fire Department inspects apartment buildings' common areas about once a year for adherence to the fire safety code. But inspecting interiors of apartments when a unit changes tenants means that landlords or an employee will have to be present far more often to accompany inspectors on a walk-through, said Steiner, whose company owns four buildings in the municipality.
And if a violation is found when a tenant is ready to move in, and the landlord is denied an occupancy permit, they would lose at least a month's rent, if not the tenant, Steiner said.
“My question is, what's the perceived problem?” he said. “They would call it proactive. I would call it expensive.”
Other landlords and management companies, who didn't want to publicly criticize the municipality they'd have to work with, said they didn't anticipate problems passing inspections but agreed the time required for them and fees would be issues.
A similar program had been proposed about six years ago but lacked support among commissioners to proceed, Berkley said.
The 2013 municipal budget includes $31,000 to hire a part-time building inspector to assist with the additional work, but no one will be hired unless the apartment inspection rules are passed.
Feller said the inspection fees — $65 for the initial inspection of each unit, and $25 for each follow-up inspection — would cover the cost of the additional employee.
The hearing is scheduled for 8 p.m. Monday in commission chambers, 710 Washington Road.
Matthew Santoni is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-380-5625 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
Add Matthew Santoni to your Google+ circles.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.