Upper St. Clair again lowers real estate taxes
Upper St. Clair lowered its real estate tax rate for the second time in four months so a 20 percent jump in property values following the county's reassessments wouldn't create an illegal windfall as prohibited by state law.
The total value of property in Upper St. Clair rose about 20 percent in the court-mandated reassessment that took effect this year, to about $2.03 billion, said Finance Director August Stache.
Because state law prohibits municipalities and school districts from reaping a large benefit from the sudden increase in tax revenue, the commissioners lowered the rate from 3.9 mills to 3.83 mills Monday night.
That would mean a property tax bill of $383 a year on every $100,000 of a property's assessed value.
Tax bills will be mailed on May 1.
Residents whose assessments increased by 20 percent or less would have their taxes stay the same or decrease; those whose assessment rose more than 20 percent would see their taxes go up, Stache said.
“If your assessment went up 15 percent, you'll see a decrease in your taxes; if it went up 25 percent, you'll see about a 5 percent increase in your taxes,” he said.
About $53 million in assessment appeals were still waiting to be decided, but Stache said their outcome should have little effect on the township's $18.82 million budget.
The budget approved by commissioners in December had lowered tax rates by about 15 percent in anticipation of the assessment increase. Monday's vote was the second time the millage was lowered in order to remain revenue-neutral.
Matthew Santoni is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-380-5625 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
Add Matthew Santoni to your Google+ circles.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.