Osborne Elementary third-graders Isabella Bock, Lilly Capezzuto, Stella Christensen, Ilijana Hasak, Jhon Freddy Krebs, Owen Petronick and Taylor Retzlaff placed first in the Western Pennsylvania Regional Odyssey of the Mind competition.
Moon Area High School sophomore Kushi Mallikarjun qualified for the National Catholic Speech and Debate Tournament in Philadelphia and the Pennsylvania Speech and Debate State Tournament at Susquehanna University.
Moon Area High School junior Rachel Fedosick was chosen as a finalist in the College and High School Photography Contest, sponsored by Nikon.
Moon Area High School sophomore Austin Jepsky won the American Legion Essay Contest for Allegheny County.
North Hills High School students inducted into the A.W. Beattie Career Center's National Technical Honor Society were senior Bonnie Adamiak and juniors Kaitlin Bigley, Allison Cross, Regis Morrissey, Hannah Trocchio and Rachel Young.
Fox Chapel Area High School sophomore Rishi Mirchandani won first place and Dorseyville Middle School eighth-grader Rohan Chalasani finished third in the Society for Analytical Chemists of Pittsburgh's High School and Middle School Essay Contest.
Fox Chapel Area High School junior Hannah Song was named “Best Delegate” at the Carnegie Mellon University Model United Nations Conference.
Fox Chapel Area High School senior Susheel Khetarpal finished second in Student Congress at the North Allegheny Congress Forensic Tournament.
Moon Area High School senior Kristina Kiritchenko won first place in poem recitation at Washington & Jefferson College's German Day Competition.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.