Robinson's legal bills add up
Robinson's legal bills so far this year are close to matching 2012's total.
Commissioners had a heated discussion on the topic on Monday. The township spent $122,063.48 on legal bills between January and April, compared to $132,423 all of last year.
Commissioners Samuel Abatta and Ronald Shiwarski claim the township's board is wasting money with frivolous court battles, and by hiring special counsel to handle a legal problem.
Vice Chairman Jesse Forquer, however, maintains that the higher legal fees are tied to problems left unresolved by the township's former long-term solicitor, Downtown-based law firm Goldberg, Kamin & Garvin, which resigned in January.
Abatta, who is chairman of the board of commissioners, also took issue with the board voting 3-2 in April to have its solicitor appeal four zoning variances granted by the zoning hearing board.
“So my point to that is that the Robinson township commissioners' attorney, the Robinson township zoning hearing board attorney — all those funds come from the same pot. It's like you're infighting here, which is totally ludicrous,” Abatta said on Wednesday.
Some commissioners pointed out that $15,694 of the legal costs this year went to Goldberg, Kamin & Garvin and some of that was carry over from last year.
After serving the township for about 30 years, Goldberg, Kamin & Garvin resigned in January after the Robinson board voted 3-2, with Abatta and Shiwarski in the minority, to fire the firm or allow it to resign because of alleged conflicts of interest and unsatisfactory representation.
Goldberg, Kamin & Garvin maintains that it could have resolved some of the township's significant legal issues months or even years ago.
“Certain members of the board of commissioners and certain members of the administrative staff refused to listen and accept our legal advice,” said attorney Robert Garvin, although he said the firm could not discuss specifics.
Forquer disagreed and said that cost overruns on Robinson's legal fees were not unusual. The township's annual budget for legal fees is $100,000.
In January, the township hired an interim solicitor, John Butya, and then hired a permanent solicitor, Plum-based Bruce E. Dice & Associates, in March. In addition, in February it hired lawyer Anthony Giglio of Forest Hills-based Andrews & Price LLC as a special counsel to handle legal issues over The Mall at Robinson's tax increment financing agreement with Robinson.
Forquer pointed to the resolution of some long-term cases, such as last month's settlement after a six-year court battle with Coventry Park LLC, the developer of the Stafford Park residential project. The township had denied variances, building permits and other documents for the Clever Road project. Giglio also handled that settlement.
Abatta, however, said Goldberg, Kamin & Garvin was prepared to finalize the same settlement offer, and that the township's insurance company would have paid for legal fees in the dispute.
Tory N. Parrish is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 412-380-5662 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.