Share This Page

School notices: North Allegheny senior traveling to England for Linguistics Olympiad

| Wednesday, May 22, 2013, 9:10 p.m.

Richard (Tommy) McCoy, a senior at North Allegheny Senior High School, will represent the United States as a member of the second North American Computational Linguistics Olympiad team in Manchester, England.

Connor Phillips and Richard (Tommy) McCoy, seniors at North Allegheny Senior High School, were named semifinalists in the 2013 U.S. Presidential Scholars Program.

Shady Side Academy Middle School's Science Olympiad team won the Pennsylvania State Tournament held at Juniata College.

Canonsburg Middle School students Samuel O'Bryan, C.J. O'Shell, Dimitri Pihiou, and Robby Sanders Jr. placed second in Pennsylvania for the seventh- grade division of the Navy-sponsored competition eCybermission.

Mia Lynch, a second-grader at Hartwood Elementary School in the Fox Chapel Area district, received an honorable mention in the PBS KIDS GO! Writers Contest.

Lauren Eisenreich of Wexford, a sophomore at Youngstown State University, received the De-Crane Houser Memorial Scholarship at the Youngstown State University Student Awards Banquet.

South Park High School students Aaron Funaiock, Mitchell Klocke, Jake Neiport, and Sebastian Albertson participated in a four-day “Spirit of America Youth Leadership Program” on the Freedoms Foundation campus at Valley Forge.

The Allegheny County Health Department honored the following students for outstanding projects at the 74th annual Pittsburgh Regional Science and Engineering Fair at the Carnegie Science Center: Lyta Nicoll, a sixth-grader at Montessori Centre Academy in Shaler; William Hebda, a seventh-grader at Queen of Angels School in North Huntingdon; and Piyusha Sane, a senior at North Allegheny High School.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.