Share This Page

Young Achiever: Derek Wang

| Wednesday, June 26, 2013, 9:00 p.m.
Derek Wang, 17, was one of the 20 best chemistry students in the U.S. selected to compete for a chance to represent America in the International Chemistry Olympiad. After weeks of study at the U.S. Air Force Academy, he was not able to make the top four, but plans to compete again next year.

Age: 17

Family: Parents, Chuan-Bao Wang and Xiaojing Zhang; sister Janet, 13.

Residence: Franklin Park

School: Derek will be a senior at North Allegheny High School in the fall.

Hobbies/Interests: Derek runs cross-country and track; plays the violin in the Pittsburgh Youth Symphony Orchestra and in a string quartet for weddings and events; and is a member of North Allegheny's science club and forensics team.

Noteworthy: Earlier this month, Derek was one of the best chemistry students in the nation seeking to qualify for the International Chemistry Olympiad, which will be held in Moscow. Extensive testing selected the nation's top 20 chemistry students for a study camp June 4-19 at the U.S. Air Force Academy in Colorado Springs, Colo. There, they received college- and graduate-level instruction before another series of exams and lab work selected the top four for international competition. Though he did not make the top four, Derek already is planning to try again for next year's team.

Quote: “We had the nation's best chemistry students competing for the top spots, but we were all able to become friends, too... It was a really great opportunity to meet these people that I'll remember for the rest of my life.”

— Matthew Santoni

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.