Monroeville Council appoints Yakim to zoning board
Monroeville Council appointed a resident to the zoning hearing board on Tuesday with a deciding vote from Councilman Bernhard Erb, who likened opposition to the appointment to bullying.
Council voted 4-3 to appoint John Yakim, a former council candidate and political ally of the four council members who appointed him — Erb, Lois Drumheller, Diane Allison and Clarence Ramsey.
The appointment comes a week after council candidate Linda Gaydos gave council members information about delinquent taxes that a Yakim-owned real estate company owed to Allegheny County.
Established by Yakim and his wife, Sandra Yakim, the company owes more than $3,000 in county real estate taxes on properties in McKeesport, Pitcairn, Turtle Creek and Homestead, according to county records.
Erb said Gaydos' actions and her comments after the previous meeting constituted bullying.
“Had that argument (against Yakim) been positive initially, that was a valid argument. But what occurred was bullying,” Erb said. “Threatening and bullying.”
Mayor Greg Erosenko said he didn't see any threats or bullying.
Drumheller and Erb said Tuesdaythat Yakim was more qualified than resident Gary Grysiak — who also had volunteered to fill the vacancy.
After Drumheller received the information about Yakim's back taxes, he sent her an email that detailed his business struggles and his intention to pay the taxes.
Yakim last week said he plans to liquidate some of his properties, which in turn will ensure that back taxes are paid.
The zoning hearing board makes decisions regarding variances and adherence to zoning code. Yakim's four-year term expires in 2017.
Kyle Lawson is a staff writer for Trib Total Media.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.