Upper St. Clair schools to restructure elementary enrollment
The Upper St. Clair School District will restructure elementary attendance areas during the next few years to balance enrollment among its three K-4 schools.
Superintendent Patrick O'Toole said the district needs to account for students likely to move into two housing developments being built during the next few years.
“We're looking at the estimated number of children and making projections on how many children would come out of a new neighborhood,” O'Toole said. “We're going to be looking at these throughout the year, and as we start the staffing and budgeting process, we'll make recommendations on any changes to attendance areas.”
He emphasized the district would phase in changes, to minimize the number of students having to change schools. Reassignments would be done by neighborhood. Any major changes would trigger meetings with parents.
Though each school is built to house about the same number of students, Baker Elementary off Morton Road has only about 400 students, compared to 480 at Streams Elementary on Ashlawn Drive and 500 at Eisenhower Elementary on Warwick Drive, he said.
The district will need to decide which schools can accept new students from the 136-home Bedner Estates development within Eisenhower's attendance area, or which would get students from a 220-unit apartment complex in Baker's attendance area. Normally, new neighborhoods are assigned to schools with the most space, O'Toole said.
Matthew Santoni is a Trib Total Media staff writer. Reach him at 412-380-5625.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.