No surface to be left untouched in update of The Woodland Hills Academy
The Woodland Hills Academy School, built in 1917, originally served as Turtle Creek High School.
Photo by Stephanie Strasburg | Tribune-Review
Crews will paint walls, rebuild stairs and replace doors as part of a multimillion-dollar renovation of The Woodland Hills Academy.
Officials estimate it will cost $12 million to $15 million to update the building, the former Turtle Creek High School on Monroeville Avenue.
Woodland Hills school directors approved the project in a split vote in May after disagreeing over whether to put money into the school, which was built in 1917, or spend it elsewhere.
“Money will always be a debate,” said Kia Williams of Turtle Creek, a mother of four children who attend Woodland Hills schools. “However, the importance of education and our children should always be put first. Investing money into education is a wonderful thing.”
As part of the renovation, crews will replace front steps, paint lockers and install an elevator. They will fix drinking fountains, remodel restrooms and improve accessibility for people with disabilities.
The Academy houses classes for children in kindergarten through eighth grade.
Mechanical work and installation of some light fixtures has started. The renovations are scheduled to be finished next year.
“I know that change can provoke both excitement and anxiety,” Academy Principal Kelly Berthold said.
Paige Mitchell is a contributing writer for Trib Total Media.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.