Bethel Park school board approves ALICE safety program
What played out in 2007 at Virginia Tech paints a clear picture of how to counter a mass shooting, says Bethel Park police Officer Scott Zinsmeister: don't be passive, as students who dropped to the ground suffered more casualties than those who tried to flee.
That's why Zinsmeister, a school resource officer, and James Modrak, a former Bethel Park police officer who now is a school district police officer, urged the school board to approve a training program that emphasizes an active response to intruders.
The board approved the ALICE program in an 8-0 vote on Tuesday, with Ron Sustich absent.
ALICE, developed by a former Texas police officer, stands for alert, lockdown, inform, counter and evacuate.
“We don‘t want to sit there and be passive targets anymore,” Modrak said. “It is no longer the standard.”
Participating school districts include Keystone Oaks, Brentwood and Connellsville.
Officer Joe Kozarian, an armed school resource officer employed by the Brentwood district, said he was certified in ALICE two years ago and recently starting relaying the program to teachers.
Kozarian is director of the National Association of School Resource Officers' Region 3, which covers Pennsylvania, New York, Delaware and New Jersey.
Modrak and Zinsmeister said that during a training program at ALICE headquarters in Ohio, they learned to instruct staff and students about what to do if a shooting occurs. One key, Modrak said, is to evacuate.
At Virginia Tech, Seung-Hui Cho fatally shot 32 people and wounded 17 before committing suicide.
Modrak noted that in the 1999 shooting at Columbine High Schoolin in Colorado, many students hid in the library, even though they could have exited the building. Ten students died and 12 were wounded in that room.
The ALICE program expands the idea of “lockdown,” Modrak said. In addition to locking doors, people should barricade them with items.
Critics say ALICE encourages students to attack the attacker, but Zinsmeister disagrees.
“It is not about fighting; it is not about violence,” Zinsmeister said. “ALICE is not about aggression. It is about survivability.”
The “counter” portion of the program means distraction, Modrak said, such as throwing items at an attacker.
Modrak and Zinsmeister said the program takes into account students' ages and offers drills similar to regular fire drills.
The school district paid about $700 to train Modrakand Zinsmeiste, spokeswoman Vicki Flotta said. The district hopes to pay for training materials with grants, she said.
Staff writer Tory N. Parrish contributed to this article. Eric Eisert is a contributing writer for Trib Total Media.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.