Goddard School owner will offer new proposal
By Matthew Santoni
Published: Wednesday, Dec. 25, 2013, 9:00 p.m.
After an application to build a Goddard School preschool off Washington Road in Upper St. Clair was denied this spring, the owner of the Goddard franchise in Peters is now trying to build on another site.
Robert A. Santo is scheduled to go before the Upper St. Clair commissioners on Jan. 6 with his plans to build a Goddard school on Painters Run Road along the township's border with Mt. Lebanon. He said the new school would be convenient to both municipalities, while relieving some of the demand on his current location.
“We've been full at the Peters school for four and a half years,” he said.
Santo's previous application to build the school on slightly less than an acre of land off North Highland Road was denied because zoning changes would have been required to allow the school in a residential zone, said municipal planning director Scott Brilhart.
Residents raised concerns about traffic in the area, which already has been heightened by the presence of a Trader Joe's market and several restaurants.
The larger size of the Painters Run Road site will allow construction of a 10,500-square-foot school — large enough to include a gymnasium, an amenity lacking in the Peters location, Santo said. The school will have up to 152 children at a given time, though more families could be enrolled given that some children only will attend for part of the day.
The proposed site is currently occupied by a vacant restaurant and two single-family homes.
The preliminary land use plan and conditional use application for the school was recommended for approval by the planning commission in November. A public hearing on the request will be held during the commissioners' meeting at 7:30 p.m. Jan. 6 in the township building.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.