Share This Page

Young Achiever: Sarah Newborn

| Wednesday, June 18, 2014, 9:01 p.m.
Sarah Newborn, 17, of Murrysville, who recently won a $1,000 scholarship from the Western Pennsylvania Trial Lawyers Association (WPTLA) for her essay about a recent Supreme Court decision.

Noteworthy: The Western Pennsylvania Trial Lawyers Association awarded Sarah a $1,000 scholarship after she submitted an essay about a recent Supreme Court decision for its annual scholarship essay contest. She also received the South Hills High School Alumni scholarship, ALCOA scholarship, and Cedarville University Provost's Scholar Award. Sarah will attend Cedarville University in Ohio this fall, where she plans to major in allied health with a minor in religious studies.

Age: 18

Residence: Murrysville, Westmoreland County

Family: Parents Mark and Maryalice; brothers Joshua, 27, Adam, 21, and Aaron, 19; sister, Rebekah, 25.

Education: Home educated in the Franklin Regional School District, senior.

Background: Newborn's extracurricular activities include competitive debate and speech, Teen Pact Leadership and bible study. She enjoys equestrian training, martial arts and performing spoken word poetry. She volunteers at UPMC Children's Hospital and Cornerstone Ministries.

Quote: “I am honored that the Western Pennsylvania Trial Lawyers Association recognized my essay as one of the top three. The topic was very complex and difficult to write about, but I am glad that I researched it because I learned how important legal issues are affecting our society.”

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.