8th-grader a hit with judges at talent show
After impressing judges with her rendition of “Mercy,” Gabby Barrett won the 2014 Kean Quest Talent Search title at the recent event at the Kean Theatre in Gibsonia.
An eighth-grader in St. Therese School in Munhall, Gabby won a recording package with studio Audible Images in Ross, having earned the top combined score of the four judges at the Youth Finals.
Twenty-nine singers, ages 18 and younger, competed in the finals before an audience of about 350.
Jake Pederson of Gibsonia won the Audience Choice award at the finale with his performance of “All of Me” by John Legend.
The Pine-Richland High School freshman played the piano and sang to collect the highest vote total from the audience. He won a recording package with Audible Images.
Jackie Evancho, a Kean Quest contestant in 2008 and 2009 who now is an international recording artist, presented Maura Yates of Franklin Park with the fourth annual Jackie Evancho Award, which is given to a contestant who competed in the Kean Quest for two or more years.
Yates played the guitar and performed Taylor Swift's “Picture to Burn.” The North Allegheny High School senior has competed in Kean Quest four years.
Proceeds from Kean Quest sponsorships and ticket sales benefit the St. Barnabas Free Care Fund for the St. Barnabas Health Foundation.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Think before you ink: Tattoo removal a $27M annual business
- No takers for old McCandless movie theater