Mt. Lebanon School District, municipality reach deal on turf field's maintenance
Mt. Lebanon School District will use its equipment to “fluff” the artificial turf field the municipality is installing near the high school, if it meets the turf manufacturer's requirements.
The school board voted, 7-1, on Monday to enter a maintenance agreement with the municipality. Board member Dan Remely opposed the measure, and Scott Goldman was absent.
The district has staff and machinery to go over the high school's artificial turf to loosen the crumb-rubber infill when it gets packed down and stand up the plastic “grass” when it's trampled. The municipal turf's manufacturer will review the district's equipment and procedures to make sure they would be sufficient to maintain the new field's warranty.
Superintendent Timothy Steinhauer said performing the work on the municipality's $1.05 million field, which was approved earlier this month and set for installation in August, would cost the district about $4,300 a year.
That's compared with the $5,700 a year it spends to line, dry and fill the infields of the grass baseball fields on Cedar Boulevard.
The district usually fluffs its turf about once a month, but would do it more often if it's heavily used.
Resident Kimberly Schevtchuk, who is opposed to the turf project, said the school district could be exposing itself to liability for injuries suffered on the municipal turf or for any of the long-term health effects of the crumb-rubber infill on young athletes.
She urged the board to rescind the agreement, but solicitor Thomas Peterson said maintaining the municipal field did not increase the district's exposure to lawsuits.
Matthew Santoni is a staff writer for Trib Total Media.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.