ShareThis Page

Dormont to hold public hearing on revised zoning codes

| Thursday, Feb. 19, 2015, 1:27 a.m.
Guy Wathen | Trib Total Media
Trevor Howells, of Shaler, tattoos one of his mentors Jim Stanley, of Dormont, inside the Alter Ego Body Art Studio in Dormont on Monday, Feb. 16, 2015. Howells had just completed his apprenticeship and was giving Stanley a tattoo as part of a graduation tradition.

New zoning regulations could draw the curtains on some of Dormont's most prolific businesses, if passed by council next month.

Part of Dormont's revised zoning code, up for a hearing March 2, would change requirements for operating pawn shops, cash-for-gold shops, check-cashing businesses and tattoo parlors by limiting where new ones can open and requiring them to follow new rules for security and visibility.

A series of ordinances up for a vote at the same time would apply some of the same rules to existing businesses that would otherwise be “grandfathered” or exempted under the old zoning code, said borough Manager Jeff Naftal.

“Tattoo parlors and coin shops ... don't attract people to stop, park, walk around and spend money. It doesn't make for a people-friendly business district,” said council President Bill McCartney. “The (proposed zoning code change) wasn't aimed at them, necessarily, it was aimed at improving the zoning to attract more diverse businesses.”

McCartney said the zoning code rewrite was needed to bring the borough's regulations up to date with current standards and court cases, establish a broader range of zoning types and allowable uses, and set rules that fit how residents want to live.

“Our previous code didn't allow dogs in the parks until three years ago, that's how behind the times we were,” he said.

One new rule for tattoo parlors and body piercing shops would require them to cover their windows and keep any work areas screened from view from entrances and public spaces.

That concerns Dave Spik and his wife, Jaime Wilson-Spik, Dormont residents and co-owners of Alter Ego Body Art Studio, which has two walls of floor-to-ceiling windows overlooking Potomac Avenue.

“There's a lot of stigmas that come with tattoo shops. We're saying we don't have anything to hide: Our shop is clean and using proper sterilization procedures,” Wilson-Spik said. “If this passes, we'd be having to kind of go back in time, and hide all of that.”

Spik said there were issues with the proposed requirement that tattoo shops follow certain sterilization and health standards and display any registrations required by the state Department of Health, because Pennsylvania has no statewide licensing of tattoo parlors.

Under the new rules, check-cashing businesses, pawn shops/cash-for-gold and firearms businesses also must be well-lit and visible from the street, without any merchandise or obstructions in the windows. They must have security plans filed with the borough and authorization for police to enforce trespassing laws on their premises.

Borough Solicitor John Rushford said the move would make the rules for safety and health equal for new and pre-existing businesses.

“These requirements are all relatively easy to comply with,” he said.

Sarbor Olimov, general manager of MaxPoint Gold Buyers on West Liberty Avenue, said his shop already complies with most of the proposed rules.

“We have a security system, our windows aren't tinted, and we don't sell merchandise, so there's nothing to display in the windows,” he said.

New tattoo parlors, check-cashing businesses and pawn shops will be permitted only in “urban neighborhood commercial” districts to be located at either end of West Liberty Avenue as it passes through the borough, and then only with special approvals.

Proposed restrictions would bar such businesses from being opened within 600 feet of a school or public park, 100 feet of a residence, 1,000 feet of any businesses selling alcohol or 1,000 feet of an existing pawn shop, check-cashing business or similar use.

Naftal said the location restrictions would not apply to existing businesses, including the tattoo parlors, check-cashing businesses and pawn shops.

The zoning update would establish standards for “local neighborhood commercial” districts, which would cover most of West Liberty and Potomac Avenue businesses; “transit-oriented development” districts for denser and mixed-use developments around the Potomac and Dormont Junction light-rail stations; and separate zones for “single-family,” “one- and two-family” and “multi-family” residential development.

The update also puts the code online in an easily readable, searchable format, Naftal said.

Matthew Santoni is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-380-5625 or

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.