Oakmont authority to handle Verona's water, sewer billing
Verona Council approved a contract Tuesday night that hands over water and sewer service billing to Oakmont Water Authority.
The borough previously used the Allegheny County Sanitation Authority (Alcosan) to bill for sewage service, but realized that residents were not being notified about delinquent payments.
There will not be a rate increase for residents. Alcosan is raising it billing service rates 11 percent next year. Verona has always used Oakmont Water Authority for water bills.
The agreement with Oakmont will allow the authority to begin collecting delinquent accounts, and to begin billing residents for both water and sewer for at least one year.
Councilman Pat McCarthy acknowledged that some residents will be hit initially with high payments of delinquent accounts. When some residents sold a home they were being notified of past due payments that had accrued late fees they may not have been aware of.
“This way, people will see it all right there,” he said.
Council also voted to move forward with sending letters to owners of abandoned properties.
The letters will notify owners that if they don't bring their properties up to borough code or come forward, the borough will take court action.
The borough can come after the owner's personal assets.
The borough's fee schedule has also been updated, resulting in some fee increases for some zoning permits and applications.
The fees have not been updated for some time, so council surveyed surrounding municipalities and adopted the average of those municipalities fees.
Kate Wilcox is a freelance writer for Trib Total Media.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.