Oakmont holds line on taxes for 2013
Oakmont officials unanimously passed a final budget for 2013 that will not raise taxes.
The $3.35 million budget, which was approved Thursday night, keeps taxes at 4.5 mills.
“Nothing significant has changed,” said Borough Manager Lisa Cooper Jensen.
Council did express interest in reopening the budget in the new year, once the borough receives more information on tax reassessment from Allegheny County.
“I don't know if we'll even need to do that or not,” Jensen said.
“We'll see what we find.”
Police budget set
The police budget, which was the subject of debate during the budget process, is set at $1.25 million.
It includes about $65,000 for raises to promote two officers to sergeant, as well as an extra $30,000 for part-time officers.
The 2012 budget for part-time officers was $110,000. It will be $140,000 in 2013.
Police Chief David R. DiSanti Sr. said he would ideally like to add an eighth full-time officer to the force, but would compromise by adding part-time hours to keep three officers on duty during the Monday through Friday day shift.
There has been discussion between council and the police department over whether or not to sell the department's motorcycle, for a profit of about $15,000, but Jensen said that no action was taken on that issue.
In November, DiSanti and Mayor Robert J. Fescemyer argued against selling the police motorcycle, saying that it is a good public relations tool for the department.
Kate Wilcox is a freelance writer for the Valley News Dispatch.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Washington Township supervisors grant exception to put apartments on property
- Public can learn about Narcan use during training in New Kensington
- South Butler teachers’ union rejects recommendations for new contract
- Heating oil costs lowest in years
- Armstrong County Jail board to discuss tighter security
- South Butler substitute nurse reveals staffing ‘crisis’
- New Kensington dek hockey rink slated for spring debut
- Charges likely against 2 children in Allegheny Township park vandalism
- Sign solidifies New Kensington-Arnold’s link with former Alcoa president
- Deceased man identified in Murrysville wreck
- Kiski Valley water authority, Allegheny Township dispute over School Road close to resolution