2 arrested in Arnold robberies
New Kensington Police officer Sam Long controls a verbally combative armed robbery suspect, Maurico Avent, 30, of Arnold, along 16th Street in Arnold on Monday, Jan. 7, 2013.
Photo by Eric Felack | Valley News Dispatch
Arnold police arrested two men Monday evening and charged them with trying to rob two people at gunpoint.
A man reported he was pistol-whipped when two men attempted to rob him at Fifth Avenue and 14th Street about 4:45 p.m., Patrolman David Clouse said. Nothing was stolen before the assailants fled.
The victim went to the Arnold Stop-N-Go convenience store on Constitution Boulevard to call 911.
As Patrolman Ryan Olszewski was interviewing the victim at the store, Clouse began looking for the would-be robbers.
He was flagged down by a woman who said she was hit in the chest with a gun by two men who stole her purse in the 300 block of 15th Street.
Clouse soon spotted one suspect, Maurico Avent, 30, of Arnold and arrested him after a short foot pursuit.
The second suspect, a 16-year-old boy from Arnold, was found shortly before 7 p.m. in the area of Fourth Avenue and 15th Street, Olszewski said. The boy's identity was not released.
The juvenile was the suspect identified as wielding a pistol, so he will be charged with armed robbery, Olszewski said.
Avent will be charged with robbery and possession of a small amount of marijuana, Olszewski said.
The woman's purse was not recovered as of Monday evening. Neither victim was reported to be injured.
Liz Hayes is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 724-226-4680 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.