Arnold man arrested for drugs while babysitting 2-year-old daughter
An Arnold man was baby-sitting his 2-year-old daughter on Tuesday afternoon when state police say they found him in possession of about two pounds of marijuana and a stolen handgun.
State police Trooper Jeff Brautigam said Mauricus R. Avent, 28, was arrested after he fled a traffic stop on foot in front of 1425 Third Ave., Arnold, about 3:30 p.m.
Avent was watching the child in a duplex at that address that is rented by the child's mother, who was at work. Avent claimed to be homeless, Brautigam said.
Brautigam said police saw drug activity at 1425 Third Ave. They saw Avent leave, followed him and initiated a traffic stop for illegally tinted windows and confronted him when he returned to that address.
Avent ran, and threw bags of marijuana on the ground, according to Brautigam. The short chase ended when police Tasered the suspect.
The child's mother gave police permission to search the home. More marijuana allegedly was found inside, along with a 9 mm handgun.
The girl was not hurt and was left in the custody of her mother.
State police were still formulating charges against Avent and investigating his background.
Brautigam said state police were charging Avent with drug possession, possession with intent to deliver, corruption of minors and endangering the welfare of a child.
He was being detained by New Kensington police on Tuesday evening pending arraignment.
Brian C. Rittmeyer is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 724-226-4701 or email@example.com.
More Valley News Dispatch
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.