Share This Page

Arnold father charged with violently squeezing 6-week-old boy

| Thursday, Jan. 17, 2013, 12:07 a.m.

A 20-year-old man accused of violently squeezing his 6-week-old son in Arnold and causing injuries that stopped the baby's breathing was sent to the Westmoreland County jail on Wednesday in lieu of bond pending a hearing.

Ronald Duane Cinkan was arrested Wednesday morning in his parents' residence at Johnson Street, Belle Vernon. He was arraigned by New Kensington District Judge Frank J. Pallone Jr. on charges of aggravated assault, endangering the welfare of a child, and recklessly endangering another person.

Pallone ordered him held in lieu of $50,000 pending a Jan. 31 preliminary hearing.

Police said the alleged assault happened late on Jan. 6 inside 1536 Fourth Ave., Arnold.Arnold police and county detectives allege that the infant, Isaiah Cinkan, was taken to the hospital early on Jan. 7, a day after the alleged assault.

Officer Marcia Cole's affidavit reports that Dr. Janet E. Squires found the boy had a skull fracture, about 20 to 22 rib fractures, and possible spine fractures.

Squires wrote that the baby was critically injured and “this is an unequivocal case of child abuse.”

In the affidavit, the baby's mother told police that the boy was fussy and, when she went downstairs to get a bottle, she left the baby in a swing seat.

She said she returned to find Cinkan holding the baby to his chest and squeezing the victim hard.The affidavit said the baby “stopped crying and went limp and was not breathing.”

It also alleges that Cinkan admitted to doing the same type of thing about three weeks earlier.

Chuck Biedka is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 724-226-4711 or cbiedka@tribweb.com.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.