Police: Vandergrift man admitted raping ex-girlfriend
A Vandergrift man allegedly admitted to police that he raped his ex-girlfriend on Thursday night.
Borough police charged Adam Corey McKendree, 29, of 212 Holmes St. with rape, sexual assault and aggravated indecent assault.
He was arraigned on Friday morning by District Judge Cheryl Yakopec and sent to the Westmoreland County jail in lieu of $75,000 bond.
Officers were dispatched to an address on Longfellow Street for a reported sexual assault around 9:30 p.m. Thursday.
According to court documents, the victim said she had been separated from McKendree for three years.
She said McKendree called her and told her he needed to talk with her.
Moments later — while they were still on the phone — he was at her front door.
The woman told police that McKendree entered her apartment and dragged her to the bedroom, telling her he wanted to have sex. She yelled “no” several times, told McKendree what he was doing was wrong and tried unsuccessfully to get away.
Afterward, McKendree allegedly said he was going to beat up the woman's new boyfriend and left her apartment. The woman called police and an ambulance, and was taken to Allegheny Valley Hospital in Harrison.
Officers met with McKendree about 10:30 p.m., and he came to the police station.
According to police, McKendree told them he called the woman and said he wanted to come to her apartment to talk. He allegedly admitted walking into the woman's apartment without knocking or asking to come in, grabbing the woman and taking her to a bedroom.
Police say McKendree admitted having sex with the woman, and said he felt guilty and upset and ran out of the apartment because he didn't want to get in trouble.
A preliminary hearing before Yakopec was scheduled for 2:30 p.m. Jan. 29.
Brian C. Rittmeyer is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 724-226-4701 or email@example.com.
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.