Plum lawyer pleads guilty to $1.7M mortgage fraud
A Plum attorney has pleaded guilty to operating a complex, $1.7 million fraud scheme whose victims included two of her relatives.
Lisa Gerideau-Williams, 46, of Cherrywood Drive on Friday pleaded guilty before Chief U.S. District Judge Gary L. Lancaster to 16 counts that included wire fraud, filing false income tax returns and not filing tax returns at all.
The office of U.S. Attorney David J. Hickton said Gerideau-Williams used her mortgage-brokering business, Genesis Home Solutions, and her two real estate transaction companies, Millennium Settlement Services and Professional Settlement Solutions, to juggle a “multi-faceted fraud scheme” from 2005 to 2008.
Prosecutors, led by Assistant U.S. Attorney Brendan T. Conway, alleged Gerideau-Williams would submit loan applications to lenders that included false information and were made without the borrowers' permission.
Another aspect of the scheme was that she would accept money from lenders that was intended to pay liabilities associated with the collateral.
Rather than paying the liabilities, prosecutors said Gerideau-Williams would keep the money to fund her “lavish lifestyle.”
She is accused of defrauding borrowers who would pay her for title insurance and services such as the recording of deeds and mortgages — services she didn't provide.
Prosecutors said title insurance companies also were victimized because she failed to submit fees for insurance. She continued to issue insurance even after the companies revoked her authority to do so.
“Gerideau-Williams' fraud was particularly egregious related to the property located at 120 Cypress Hill Drive” in Penn Hills, according to the U.S. Attorney's office:
• Before 2005, Gerideau-Williams rented and lived in the house.
• On Sept. 6, 2005, she sold the house from the owner to an elderly relative without the knowledge of either person. A lender financed the fake deal and Gerideau-Williams took the money without recording the change in ownership, making it appear the original owner still owned the property free of any mortgages.
• On March 13, 2006, Gerideau-Williams arranged to buy the house herself, financed through a fraudulent loan. While she recorded the deed transferring ownership to her own name, she did not record the mortgage. Again, it appeared the house was free of liens but now in her name.
• On Aug. 7, 2006, Gerideau-Williams sold the house to another relative, who financed the purchase through a fraudulent loan Gerideau-Williams secured. She received the proceeds from the sale but did not record the deed or the mortgage — making it appear she still owned the house free of any liens.
• On Jan. 19, 2007, and Feb. 20, 2007, she sold the house twice more to the same relative, who again financed the purchases through fraudulent loans secured by Gerideau-Williams.
She again kept the money and still did not record the change in ownership.
Another “equally egregious” part of the scheme involved loans Gerideau-Williams secured in the name of the elderly relative, Hickton's office said.
When she arranged for this relative to buy the Penn Hills house, she financed the loan by offering up the relative's Harrisburg home as collateral in 2005. She secured three more refinance transactions in 2007 using the same Harrisburg house, prosecutors said.
Gerideau-Williams kept the proceeds from the loans and did not record the mortgages. She also issued title insurance without authority to do so, forged her relative's signature and failed to pay the liabilities associated with the collateral as required by the lenders.
Finally, in 2004 she is accused of filing tax returns that grossly understated her earnings and of not filing returns at all in 2005 and 2006.
Judge Lancaster scheduled Gerideau-Williams' sentencing for June 7. She could receive a sentence of as much as 235 years in prison and a fine of as much as $3.7 million.
The Mortgage Fraud Task Force, which is comprised of federal, state and local law enforcement agencies plus others involved in the mortgage industry, investigated the case.
Liz Hayes is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 724-226-4680 or email@example.com.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.