Allegheny Township bed and breakfast zoning battle remains unresolved
By George Guido
Published: Thursday, Jan. 31, 2013, 1:16 a.m.
The Allegheny Township Zoning Hearing Board expects to rule on March 6 whether the township's only bed and breakfast can continue to operate.
Board members heard nearly four hours of testimony on Wednesday night from township officials and those representing Larry Musselman, operator of the 1876 Bed & Breakfast on Markle Road.
Musselman, who has owned the property since 1978, contends that the use of the old farm house and barn on the site hasn't changed since the farm was established in 1876.
That was long before Allegheny Township adopted zoning in 1970.
Township officials contend that Musselman needs a conditional-use permit in order to continue operating.
The bed and breakfast has been closed since Dec. 5.
The facility is in a residential area, but also in an area that is an agricultural security zone. That designation has limited uses.
Musselman contends that land's use has been continuous, and that he is “grandfathered in.” Grandfathering in the state allows a property owner to continue using a site for an identical purpose after zoning has been established.The original township ordinance regarding residential uses didn't allow facilities such as bed and breakfasts, but conditional use allowing that type of activity was added in 1997.
Musselman also testified that he was told by various township officials in recent years that the use is grandfathered. He cited former township zoning officer Jack Allen and current Board of Supervisors chairwoman Kathy Starr as two people who told him about grandfathering.
Musselman has a portion of the farmhouse and a loft in the barn set aside for paying guests and others who work on the farm in return for a place to stay.
He said he once referred to the facility as “just a place to stay,” but began using the slogan “bed and breakfast” when that term was popularized.The farm produces hay and other crops and Musselman also uses the property for “rescue horses” that have been abused and abandoned by previous owners.
Recently, Musselman and a partner have been offering carriage rides to the public.
Much of Wednesday's testimony centered around the credibility of witnesses and township officials.
Attorneys for both sides attempted to impugn witnesses regarding issues such as how a notice of violation was delivered; how a nearby carriage business was impacted; why a township official signed a document in one color of ink and dated the same document with another color of ink; and whether a deceased township resident and handyman actually lived on the farm or in another home that Musselman owns elsewhere in the township.
Zoning hearing board Solicitor Larry Loperfito told attorneys Robert Liotta, representing Musselman, and Gary Falatovich, representing the township, to have to formally summarize the facts for the board by Feb. 27.
Falatovich pinch-hit for Allegheny Township's regular solicitor, Bernie Matthews Jr., who has also done work for Musselman.
Pennsylvania zoning hearing boards have 45 days to issue a ruling after testimony has been closed.
George Guido is a freelance writer for Trib Total Media.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- West Deer man accused of sexual contact with pre-teen ordered to trial
- Buffalo Township real estate taxes to rise by almost 30%
- Leechburg fifth-grader’s art chosen for cover of anti-drug calendar
- South Butler hires company to perform security audit of buildings, train staff
- Oakmont addresses Plum Creek flooding
- East Deer blames 13% tax increase on assessment appeal losses
- DA will audit Gilpin evidence
- Suspected burglar awaits extradition from Ohio
- Education Partnership provides school supplies to Fort Crawford students in New Kensington
- Classic novel, new film share similar titles, not much else
- Drivers caught in bottleneck traffic merging on Route 28