Freeport debates middle school site
The Freeport Area School Board debated where to place the proposed middle school Wednesday night, gearing up for a public hearing on the $30 million building project next week.
Committee members informally decided a spot more than 200 yards from the current high school.
This option, which was one of two discussed last night, will be presented to the public during a public hearing Monday at the high school.
The other option would have placed the middle school about 70 feet from the high school. When facing the front of the high school, the new middle school would be to the back left in either option.
The favored option costs about $300,000 more because it requires two long driveways to connect the middle school to the high school parking lot and exits to roads. It could also cost more to maintain because there would be more lawn area.
But the board has the option of making the building one or two stories in the farther location.
Four of the five board members present Wednesday chose the farther location because it would allow the district to build a new high school next to the middle school in the future.
Director Barbara Toy-Gaydos said favors locating the middle school in the far corner of the property.
“We utilize that land better and have more open access to it,” she said.
With the closer location, if a new high school is built in the future it will have to be accessed across a ravine. That would require building a bridge.
But board member Christine Davies said she is concerned about other costs, like adding more teachers.
It would be about a 10-minute walk from the high school to the middle school, making sharing teachers more difficult.
“We can save money on our staffing, we can save money on everything by having that building closer,” she said.
Superintendent Chris DeVivo acknowledged that it would make class schedules more difficult, but that it was feasible. He favors the farther location.
“The flexibility of the property is increased,” he said. “... We can't bind future boards.”
Kate Wilcox is a freelance writer for Trib Total Media.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- ‘Banshee’ props, inventory up for sale
- ATI picketer injured at Harrison mill
- Union files lawsuit against ATI
- Arnold bakery reopens at is new ‘old’ location
- Federal court ruling could have impact on New Kensington-Arnold school monument
- New Kensington educator infuses technology in lessons
- Allegheny Township man seeks help finding family heirloom
- Engineer advises Springdale Borough that other water plant options cost ‘significantly’ less