Teen charged as adult in Arnold robbery
A 16-year-old Arnold youth is charged as an adult for allegedly robbing a woman at gunpoint last month in Arnold.
Brandon Jackson, of the 1400 block of Alcoa Drive, is charged with a host of charges, among them robbery and conspiracy to commit robbery.
He was arrested Tuesday. Police are looking for two others.
Jackson remained in the Westmoreland County jail Wednesday in lieu of $100,000 bond pending a preliminary hearing.
According to an affidavit, Jackson and two other youths robbed a woman at a PNC Bank ATM at Fifth Avenue and 18th Street just before 3 p.m. on Jan. 26.
The woman told police she had been robbed by three youths. One pointed a handgun at her and demanded money.
The woman said her life was repeatedly threatened.
Police were told the three ran to an apartment building along Fifth Avenue with the woman's $45.
Jackson was found hiding in the building and the woman identified him as one of the youths, the affidavit reports.
Police took him to the police station, but Jackson fled from an officer and ran down Drey Street toward Ivy Alley.
Police said he ran through numerous yards and jumped fences along both Fourth and Fifth avenues.
Arnold and New Kensington police stopped him in the 1700 block of Cherry Alley.
After a juvenile hearing in Greensburg, police were told by the district attorney's office to charge Jackson as an adult.
In addition to robbery, Jackson is charged with escape, making terroristic threats, theft, defiant trespass.
A preliminary hearing is scheduled Feb. 21 by District Judge Frank J. Pallone Jr. in New Kensington.
Chuck Biedka is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 724-226-4711 or email@example.com.
More Valley News Dispatch
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.