Police catch man who allegedly doused girlfriend with perfume, set her on fire
A two-day manhunt ended on Saturday as police found the man suspected of lighting his ex-girlfriend on fire in her Springdale apartment on Thursday.
Officers arrested Clinton C. Cohen, 27, about 4 p.m. in a Marshall-Shadeland residence, according to Pittsburgh police.
Authorities had been searching for Cohen, who they said poured flammable perfume over his ex-girlfriend and set her on fire with a cigarette lighter in front of their 3-month-old daughter.
Cohen was arrested without incident, then taken to the Allegheny County Jail, according to police.
Officers said the victim, Maria Redman, 22, of Pittsburgh Street in Springdale, was in a Pittsburgh hospital with second-degree burns over a third of her body.
Cohen choked and punched her, breaking her nose, according to police.
Allegheny County Police Lt. Jeffrey Korczyk described Redman as being in “critical, but stable condition” late last week.
An update of her condition was not available on Saturday.
Redman's infant was unharmed but was found with her mother's blood on her, police said.
Cohen faces charges of attempted homicide, aggravated assault, arson, risking a catastrophe, child endangerment and reckless endangerment regarding residents of other apartments, police said.
Police have said Cohen and Redman may have been arguing over living arrangements.
“I don't know if there had been other problems between the two, but we know he has a history of domestic assaults,” Korczyk said.
Mary Ann Thomas is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 724-226-4691 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.