East Vandergrift receives permits for stormwater project
East Vandergrift is starting to receive permits for its stormwater/sewage separation project, even though the project isn't expected to begin for another year.
Craig Bauer of KLH Engineer told council on Monday night that the PennDOT highway occupancy permit has been received, allowing work to be done on the portion of McKinley Avenue that is a state road.
The Westmoreland County Soil and Conservation District also has signed off on the project.
The only permit still needed is one from the state Department of Environmental Protection that deals with water quality.
Once that's received, in about four months, East Vandergrift can seek a PennVEST grant for the estimated $3 million dollar project.
PennVEST is expected to meet in October and the borough expects to receive an answer on the grant in January.
Officials said “a handful” of property owners still haven't signed right of way forms.
Council members will contact those residents to try and get the final signatures needed.
The borings beneath the Norfolk Southern railroad tracks that snake through the borough will add $54,000 to the project cost. The borings for the new sewer pipes will be about 120 feet deep.
Natural gas suppliers have been told they will have to get permits from state officials to dig beneath borough streets where necessary.
Some natural gas lines will have to be moved to accommodate the new sewer pipes.
Stormwater pipes, which are now commingled with sewage, will use the original system while the new pipes will just be for sewage.
George Guido is a freelance writer for Trib Total Media.
More Valley News Dispatch
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.