Washington Twp. resident charged in abuse of 2nd boy
A Washington Township man accused a week ago of molesting a 9-year-old was charged Friday with allegedly molesting the boy's 10-year-old friend, police said.James A. Lynn, 51, of the 1700 block of Washington Road, was arraigned by Washington Township District Judge Jason Buczak.
A week before, Friday ordered Lynn sent to the Westmoreland County jail in lieu of $100,000 bond pending a preliminary hearing. He posted bond but was rearrested Thursday, police said.
In the second case, Buczak sent Lynn to the county jail Friday in lieu of an additional $50,000 bond pending a combined preliminary hearing.In the new allegations, Lynn is accused of touching the 10-year-old while showering with the boy. On another occasion, the boy said he woke up to find his underwear was off.
Police say the boys had regular contact with Lynn for three months last year.
According to an affidavit, Lynn told police in December that the boys took showers at his house. Lynn said he had them face away from him to help them wash their hair and back. He denied showering with the boys.
Lynn was charged Friday with two counts each of indecent assault on someone younger than 13, corruption of minors, and endangering the welfare of children.
In the first case, Lynn allegedly touched the 9-year-old boy at Lynn's house several times.
In that case, Lynn was charged with indecent assault on a person younger than 13, corruption of minors by an adult and endangering the welfare of a child.
Police on Friday said the boys didn't tell police about the alleged molestation until November.
Buczak's office is rescheduling the preliminary hearings so that both cases can be heard on the same day.
Chuck Biedka is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 724-226-4711 or email@example.com.
More Valley News Dispatch
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.