Colfax school eyed for closure
Allegheny Valley School District board members Tuesday night sat down to iron out details of a new committee focused on determining the future of Colfax Elementary.
A committee of community members and four board members has been formed to discuss the options of moving out of the elementary, if the committee decides to close the school.
In April, Superintendent Cheryl Griffith will make a presentation about the school's status. After that, public committee meetings will be held to discuss the district's options.
Griffith said the committee would look into a facility assessment as well as the financial impact on the district.
Several board members questioned how committee members were selected.
Board member Stephen Puskar asked why there were no teachers included.
“We all participate,” board President Larry Pollick said. “You want to be there, show up.”
Board member Elizabeth Moretti asked the administration to speed the process along.
“This just keeps going on and on,” she said. “I just think we need to get started.”
Earlier in the meeting, board members were asked to consider approving $17,000 in repairs to the Colfax Elementary boiler.
“For the second month, we're spending money and we have a committee formed to see if the school will even remain open,” Puskar said.
The board also heard an update on the budget, which has a $93,266 deficit in the $19.3 million budget.
“We continue to work internally to balance the budget,” Business Manager Brad Rau said.
Kate Wilcox is a freelance writer for Trib Total Media.
More Valley News Dispatch
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.