Oakmont bridge work won't affect sewage plant
The upcoming Hulton Bridge replacement project won't affect operations at the Allegheny Valley Joint Sewage Authority's treatment plant in Harmar, which is upstream from the bridge.
Plant manager Rich Chiavaretta said future plant expansion might be necessary, but there's no impact now.
A new $80 million Hulton Bridge will be built on the side of the current span where the sewage treatment plant is located.
PennDOT hopes to begin the project to replace the 104-year-old bridge in August, and demolition of existing buildings near the bridge is due to take place this spiring.
A four-lane bridge and a pedestrian walkway will be built.
In other business
• The odor problem at the treatment plant has subsided, officials say. Officials had to find the right chemical combination to create bacteria in the digesters in the hopes of eliminating the odor, which has affected residents and businesses on both sides of the Allegheny River.
• The authority has no capital projects slated for this summer, but several minor projects are in the works.
Two pump station replacements are planned in Cheswick.
KLH Engineering will reconfigure one of the Cheswick stations that needs a wall replaced.
A cost estimate involving design fees and the scope of the project will be presented to the authority on April 24.
Equipment in the treatment area also needs to be replaced.
The authority earlier replaced pump stations along Guys Run Road in Harmar and on Colfax Street in Springdale.
• The authority is looking for a college-age student from Springdale Township to work at the plant over the summer. Applicants can contact the authority at 412-828-7227.
• The board hired Multi-Metals to install a safety railing along the skimmers to prevent falls into the sewage tank. The cost is $3,200.
George Guido is a freelance writer for Trib Total Media.
More Valley News Dispatch
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.