Bridge replacement to force Route 286 and Route 66 detours in Washington Township
Beginning Monday, motorists who travel Route 286 and Route 66 in Washington Township will have to do some extra driving.
Work is slated to begin Monday on a $1.7 million replacement of the Route 286 bridge that carries traffic over Route 66. PennDOT is using J.F. Shea Construction of Mt. Pleasant as the contractor.
During construction, Route 286 traffic will be detoured from Route 380 to Route 366 to Route 66 to Mamont Drive.
While the bridge is demolished and beams are installed on the new bridge, Route 66 traffic below will detour onto Mamont Drive.
The work will take place between 6 p.m. and 6 a.m., PennDOT officials said.
Washington Township Supervisor Joseph Olszew-ski said detour signs are posted. He believes the Route 66 detour will be in place for about three weeks.
“After that, they indicate there won't be any restrictions on Route 66,” Olszewski said.
He said township officials weren't aware that the Route 286 overpass was slated for replacement until recently.
“We're happy they are taking care of the problems in our community,” Olszewski said.
Olszewski said his primary concern is how the detours and roadwork will impact traffic on side roads.
“We are worried that it's going to throw a lot more traffic on our side streets, which we'll be monitoring with our police,” Olszewski said.
He said some school buses likely will be rerouted as well.
The project is expected to be completed by late September.
Liz Hayes is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 724-226-2680 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.