Bridge replacement stalls over power line
Winfield Township officials are hoping the Denny Mills bridge replacement project can resume shortly.
The lengthy project to replace the short bridge is on hold because of a problem with West Penn Power, which runs a line nearby.
The steel beams are set to be laid over the small tributary close to the power line, and township officials fear the beam may accidentally trigger an electrical charge from the live line.
Winfield officials want the power turned off on the line. But they say West Penn's liaison to the project is no longer with its Butler office.
Township officials said they've been unsuccessful finding the power company's contact since then.
West Penn spokesman Rob Lombardo said Thursday night that the power company has someone assigned to work with Winfield officials and will be contacting them.
The new 24-by-36 span will replace a 100-year-old bridge that was closed last year due to safety concerns.
The old bridge was used by about 800 to 1,000 vehicles per day.
The replacement bridge will cost about $225,000 through a special program designed by Butler County officials in which county crews will build or replace bridges.
Homes not tapped in sent liens
Officials said 41 liens have been sent out to property owners who haven't tapped into the new sewerage system in the Cabot section of the township.
Contractor Mortimer Excavating will have until July 1 to finish restoration work.
George Guido is a freelance writer for Trib Total Media.
More Valley News Dispatch
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.