North Apollo eyes new police deal with Kiski Township
Money from citations Kiski Township police write in North Apollo could go to the township instead of North Apollo.
That's an idea being proposed as the two municipalities discuss terms of a new contract for police services in North Apollo.
North Apollo disbanded its own police force and began contracting with Kiski Township in April 2007. The agreement was extended in 2008 for five years, through March 31.
Kiski Township police are continuing to cover North Apollo while a new contract is negotiated.
North Apollo paid Kiski Township nearly $46,800 for police services in the contract's final year, according to the borough.
Kiski Township officials are proposing the township get all money from citations written in North Apollo in place of an annual 6 percent increase on the price it charges North Apollo.
Money from citations would still initially come to the borough, which would then turn it over to the township.
“It will work out better for everybody,” Kiski Township Supervisor Jack Wilmot said.
In addition to rising costs in general, Wilmot said the department recently bought a new vehicle and added hours, which the citation money would help cover.
North Apollo Council President Gene Burns said citations written in North Apollo amount to between $5,000 and $6,000 per year.
“They do the work,” Burns said. “Why shouldn't they get the money?”
North Apollo Council directed its solicitor to look into the subject.
While Councilman Bill Campbell said the arrangement could give Kiski Township police “incentive” to write more tickets, Burns said that would be illegal.
Councilman Ed Barclay said he would want more enforcement.
“They're not going to take it because it pays less,” Councilman Tom Newton said.
Brian C. Rittmeyer is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 724-226-4701 or email@example.com.
More Valley News Dispatch
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.