RV sale ordinance nears passage in Allegheny Township
The Allegheny Township Supervisors could finalize an ordinance allowing the sale of recreational vehicles in certain residential areas in June.
The consideration to make RV sales a conditional use in R-3 zones is prompted by a proposal from Murrysville-based Cooper's RV Center to expand to the former Trunzo's ice cream parlor property along Route 356.
Township Manager Greg Primm said the planning commission is reviewing the ordinance and is expected to make recommendations to the supervisors this month. Primm also plans to send a draft proposal to the county planning office for review.
He expects the supervisors will have those recommendations in May and will be able to draft an ordinance that would be available for a public hearing and final approval in June.
The supervisors have given Cooper's owner Keith Conard permission to store some RVs on the property while the ordinance is pending.
According to Westmoreland County deeds records, Export-based Nagoda Land Group has owned the nearly 16-acre property since 2007 when it was purchased from the Trunzo family.
Jack Kelly, a resident of the Allegheny Woodlands housing development across from Trunzo's, on Wednesday told supervisors he doesn't object to the development but hopes township officials will ensure it is handled responsibly.
Among Kelly's requests were making sure any outdoor lighting shines toward the business rather than into traffic; that noise is muffled; and that any garbage containers are screened from the road.
“We welcome them here,” Kelly said, adding that the business should add to the township's tax base.
Primm and supervisors said many of Kelly's concerns will be addressed in the conditions.
Liz Hayes is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 724-226-4680 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
More Valley News Dispatch
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.