Westmoreland County pair get deal in theft of Habitat for Humanity donation box
A Westmoreland County pair will be allowed to plead guilty to lesser charges for allegedly stealing a charity's donation box if they complete community service and pay restitution, officials said Monday.
Amy Lynn Martino, 30, and Stephen M. Wray, 33, both of North Huntingdon, were charged in January with walking off with Allegheny Valley Habitat for Humanity's donation box in Pittsburgh Mills mall in Frazer.
About a day after the theft, Martino and Wray were arrested for shoplifting in the mall.
Martino and Wray were scheduled to have a preliminary hearing Monday for charges of theft, receiving stolen property, conspiracy and retail theft.
However, District Judge David Sosovicka was told by a prosecutor that Allegheny Valley Habitat for Humanity would prefer to handle the matter without a trial.
After court, Frazer police and Habitat Executive Director Diane E. Belitskus separately confirmed that the charity asked for leniency.
Sosovicka delayed the case 30 days and ordered Martino and Wray to pay $330 combined restitution. Both must stay away from the mall, and both must perform 40 hours of community service at a charity in North Huntingdon within a month.
If the two complete those requirements, they will be allowed to plead guilty to lesser charges of disorderly conduct and retail theft, Sosovicka said.
If they don't, the pair will face the original charges in Allegheny County Court.
Both suspects said they agreed to the offer and understood what they have been ordered to do.
They remain out of jail on $5,000 bond each.
Chuck Biedka is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 724-226-4711 or email@example.com.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.