Allegheny Valley School District may reduce tax millage
Residents of the Allegheny Valley School District probably will see their school tax millage cut — but not the taxes they will pay.
In reviewing the preliminary budget with the school board Thursday, Business Manager Brad Rau said he anticipates millage will be reduced because of a projected increase in real estate assessments.
Rau said that based on figures provided by Allegheny County, which won't be final until May, the district's total property values will increase by $115.6 million through reassessments.
That would make a mill of taxes worth more than it is now. And that would mean the amount of taxes paid would be higher for residents at the current rate of 23.46 mills.
But the district must by law keep the district's overall assessed value stable, eliminating the possibility of a tax windfall as a result of the reassessment.
As a result, Rau said the district will reduce the tax millage. He said based on the county's numbers, millage would be cut by 3.82 mills to 19.62 mills.
Rau said the budget for the 2013-14 school year will include about 73 percent of the revenue coming from local sources, about 25 percent from the state and less than 2 percent from federal sources.
He said a $90,000 deficit that the district faced last month has been eliminated.
Rau said the main reasons that the gap was closed included an increase in earned-income tax collections and reduced utilities costs.
Earned-income tax collections increased by about $60,000, while the savings from utilities was around $35,000.
The board expects to pass its preliminary budget May 14. Final adoption is scheduled for June 17.
Tom Yerace is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 724-226-4675 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
More Valley News Dispatch
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.