Two youths nabbed in Jeannette for Arnold carjacking
By Chuck Biedka
Published: Monday, April 22, 2013, 4:09 p.m.
Three youths carjacked an Arnold woman's car at gunpoint Monday morning, Arnold police said.
Two suspects were arrested within an hour. The woman was not hurt, according to police.
The handgun, police said, turned out to be a pellet gun.The woman's maroon Volvo was spotted by a Jeannette police officer about 45 minutes after the carjacking.
After a chase, two suspects were arrested. A third youth ran, and police are looking for him.
Arnold police Chief Willie Weber said the incident unfolded while a woman was unloading her car in the 1500 block of Fifth Avenue about 10:15 a.m.
“They walked up to her and said they wanted the car,” Weber said. “They showed her a gun, and she wisely gave them the keys. She wasn't harmed.”
The woman called police and, within minutes, police sent an alert to other police departments.
“A Jeannette officer spotted the car and read the license plate,” Weber said. “It was the car we were looking for.”
The weapon found turned out to be a pellet gun that looked like a real gun, Weber said.
The two youths — one from Arnold, the other from Jeannette — are 16 and 17. They will be charged as juveniles for armed robbery, Weber said.Jeannette police didn't return calls for comment.
Chuck Biedka is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 724-226-4711 or email@example.com.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- With no money for upkeep, Prospect Cemetery Association board to disband
- New Kensington-Arnold board debates dress code
- Brackenridge may be required by law to maintain cemetery
- Manufacturing course opens Knoch students’ eyes
- Pension woes push A-K Valley school districts to seek higher tax limits
- Valley High School students’ art projects cover the classics
- Brackenridge water rates will rise
- RV dealer seeks ‘breathing room’ in Allegheny Township
- Harmar bald eagles get crack at parenting
- Deer Creek mine discharge project should be wrapped up by late spring
- Upper Burrell delays action on gun ordinances