ShareThis Page

New Ken-Arnold school district drops full-day kindergarten

| Friday, April 26, 2013, 7:30 a.m.

A divided New Kensington-Arnold school board on Thursday decided to reduce all kindergarten classes to half-day for the 2013-14 school year.

Superintendent John Pallone said finances were a factor, but streamlining education and reducing class sizes also played into the decision.

The district will offer 12 half-day classes at its three primary schools plus a 13th “advantage” half-day kindergarten class that ideally will be used for students who need additional instruction, Pallone said. However, if the district gets an unexpected influx of students at the start of the school year, the 13th class may have to be a regular kindergarten section.

Pallone said there are conflicting opinions on whether keeping 5-year-olds in class for a full day is appropriate for their development.

Board member Regina Namey said an estimated 80 percent of the district's kindergarten students haven't attended a preschool program — making full-day kindergarten a difficult adjustment.

Additionally, she said they looked at research that showed by the time students reach third grade, there isn't statistical evidence showing students who attended full-day kindergarten perform any better than those who went for only a half-day.

“It's a hearth-wrenching decision to make,” said Namey, a retired elementary physical education teacher.

She said she agreed to the switch because she knows the district is struggling to balance the budget for 2013-14. She said she won't agree to any additions to next year's budget while educational programming is being trimmed.

Pallone said the kindergarten reduction should save about $120,000.

The board approved the half-day kindergarten plans in a 5-3 vote, with Namey, board President Bob Pallone, Eric Doutt, Jason Fularz and Pat Petit consenting. Members Marilyn Claassen, Liney Glenn and Deb Glushenko were opposed, and George Zavadak was absent.

“I don't think any amount of money that you save is worth a child's education,” said Glushenko, adding that she has several young grandchildren who soon will be attending school and she worries they will be negatively impacted by the change.

Namey said she understood why some directors voted against half-day kindergarten. She said they can reverse course in the future if they find the half-day classes are detrimental or if the district's financial situation changes.

Namey said some advantages will include the ability to offer smaller classes and more focused instruction in reading and math.

The district also is offering an additional preschool class next year, bringing the total to two preschool classes at Fort Crawford and one at Martin. The preschools are funded through a state Keystones to Opportunity grant.

Pallone said the additional preschool class should improve the district's offerings for early childhood education — which, in turn, should improve students' kindergarten performance.

The district also again will offer the grant-funded “Ready Freddy” summer transition program for incoming kindergarten students.

Pallone said students and their parents will be invited to spend about six evenings over the summer meeting classmates, touring the schools, riding a school bus and participating in other activities that will prepare the children for school.

Liz Hayes is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 724-226-4680

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.