Nursing student ran to aid New Kensington shooting victim
A New Kensington nursing student who gave first aid to a shooting victim on Monday smiled when she learned that 18-year-old Jordan Johnson was recuperating on Tuesday afternoon.
Carol Schrock, 26, was among the first to help Johnson as he lay on the sidewalk along Kenneth Avenue at Catalpa Street after a drive-by shooting at about 5 p.m. Monday.
“We were having dinner, and I heard the shots,” said Schrock, who is scheduled to graduate next month from Citizens School of Nursing. “I just ran.”
But instead of running away from danger, she ran toward it, in order to help.
Schrock said she used a shirt handed to her by another person and started to put pressure on a bullet wound in Jordan's right side.
Another neighbor put pressure on a wound in Jordan's right arm, she said.
Police weren't immediately sure whether Johnson had been shot twice or whether the same bullet caused both wounds.
Johnson talked to Schrock and asked questions while she was helping him.
“He talked to me the whole time. He kept asking if he was going to die. I kept assuring him,” Schrock said. “I just wanted him to control his breathing.
“A cop asked the man questions and told me to keep up the pressure. I did until an ambulance crew arrived and said, ‘OK. We've got it from here,' and then I got up,” Shrock said. “The cop said thanks and I left.”
Police collected evidence and are searching for the shooter and any possible accomplices.
Johnson was in a Pittsburgh hospital on Tuesday. His condition was not available. A detective spoke with him on Tuesday.
That delighted Schrock, a lifelong New Kensington resident and 2005 Valley High School graduate.
Schrock said she wants to work in a Pittsburgh hospital.
“Hopefully, I can get in at the emergency department,” she said.
Chuck Biedka is a staff writer for Trib Total Media.
More Valley News Dispatch
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.