9 accused of heroin, crack sales in Harrison, Tarentum
Nine people are accused by police with selling illegal drugs in Harrison and Tarentum.
The ongoing arrests started last week under auspices of the Attorney General's Bureau of Narcotics drug task force.
More arrests are anticipated.
The three men and six women are accused of selling heroin, crack cocaine, as well as suboxone sublingual film patches — a medicine used to help opiate addicts to withdraw from addiction — and Clonazepam, a pill used legitimately to treat seizures or panic disorders.
They are charged with counts related to illegal drug possession and sales.
District Judge Carolyn Bengel arraigned the suspects. Bond amounts range from $5,000 to $25,000.
Their names, ages, last known addresses, charge and number of counts are:
• Allene Ecker, 25; 739 Prospect St., Brackenridge; one count each;
• Megan McMunn; 24, 361 Park Ave. Harrison; one count each;
• Clinton Weleski, 30; 201 E. Sixth Ave., Tarentum; two counts each;
• Harry Williams III, 27; 8C Park Ave., Sheldon Park, two counts of possession, four counts of sales;
• Dyllon Powell, 20; last known address Brackenridge; one count each;
•Alicia R. Ravio, 25; 874 Third Ave., Brackenridge; one count each;
• IIah Verner, 29; 66 Vine St., 2nd floor; Harrison; one count each;
• Jessica Bizic, 35; 17 Sheldon Park Apt D, Harrison; one count each, Clonazepam pills;
• Daureen Linn, 29; 2873 Meadow St., Harrison; three counts each, suboxone sublingual film patches.
Chuck Biedka is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 724-226-4711 or email@example.com.
More Valley News Dispatch
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.