Apollo-Ridge, teachers lock up 5-year contract
Teachers in the Apollo-Ridge School District will return to classes this fall with a new contract in place.
The five-year agreement, which begins Aug. 2, gives teachers an average annual raise of less than 1 percent over the life of the contract, and requires a deductible for health insurance.
The school board approved the contract by a vote of 7-0 at a special meeting Monday. Board members Forrest Schultz and Rick Fetterman were absent.
Teachers, members of the Apollo-Ridge Education Association, had previously accepted it, Superintendent Matt Curci said.
The union represents nearly 100 members.
Over the contract's five years, the agreement provides an average annual pay increase of 0.778 percent, according to the district.
Raises are 0.3 percent in the first year; 1.19 percent in the second year; 1.14 percent in the third year; 1.33 percent in the fourth year; and 0.07 percent in the final year.
“We did what worked,” board President Greg Primm said of the raise rates.
Information on how the raises will affect the starting and top salaries was not immediately available.
The district will save about $67,000 on health insurance by moving teachers to a plan with deductibles and increasing co-payments.
Deductibles will be $100 for single coverage and $200 for family coverage, according to the district. Teachers previously had no deductibles in their health plan.
The 2013-14 school year will be the last that the district offers tuition reimbursement to teachers, Primm said.
Primm praised Curci for his leadership in getting the contract approved early.
“I was really happy to get it done,” Primm said.
Curci said he's happy that the district will be able to move into the next school year “with this off our plate.”
Brian C. Rittmeyer is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at firstname.lastname@example.org.
More Valley News Dispatch
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.