No tax hike for Allegheny Valley schools
By Jodi Weigand
Published: Tuesday, June 18, 2013, 12:01 a.m.
The Allegheny Valley School District has passed a budget for next school year that doesn't increase taxes.
Officials said it's the fourth straight year that the district has not raised taxes.
The district's $19.6 million spending plan is about a 1.6 percent, or $317,000, increase over the current budget.
The district set the 2013-14 property tax rate so that overall collections would remain the same as this school year even though property values throughout the district increased under Allegheny County's reassessment.
To achieve that, the district adjusted the millage rate down from 23.26 mills to about 19.94 mills.
Some property owners will pay higher property taxes due to a higher assessed home value, but the district will not collect more revenue, said Business Manager Brad Rau.
A home valued at $137,182 — the district average — would pay about $31 less in 2013-14 than the current school year, according to district calculations.
Board president Larry Pollick noted that the district did not cut educational programs to achieve savings.
“Our administration has been working on this budget since the beginning of the school year,” Pollick said. “They met monthly to discuss how to use our resources most effectively.”
The district realigned some student programs, did not fill some vacant staff positions, eliminated some contracted services and implemented cost-containment strategies such as energy conservation.
Jodi Weigand is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 724-226-4702 or email@example.com.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Roads come up short as Allegheny County refigures miles
- Suspect eludes Freeport police by jumping into Buffalo Creek
- $371K awarded for Alle-Kiski Valley parks and recreation projects
- Police chase lands New Ken man in jail
- Owner of Natrona Heights store indicted for food stamp fraud
- Chill won’t halt Hulton Bridge work
- New Ken man’s mission to Haiti helps the poor
- Charges held for court in robbery
- Winfield Township drafts first comprehensive plan
- Virginia community helps to find lost puppy from New Kensington
- East Vandergrift sewage project bids miss mark