Deer's visit could force changes at Apollo-Ridge High School
The main entrance to Apollo-Ridge High School will get a look-over for possible improvements after a deer recently forced its way into the building.
The incident happened on the morning of June 5; school was still in session.
Superintendent Matt Curci said a deer that had been in the parking lot ran “full speed” into the magnetically closed lobby door with enough force to open it.
A Kiski Township police officer stationed at the school was able to direct it out another door, Curci said.
No one was hurt and there was no damage to the school, Curci said.
Curci said there are not any immediate security concerns because the door is not easily opened.
“It takes a heck of a lot of force and right at the right spot to make that happen,” he said. “It had to hit it in the right spot with a lot of force.”
The state Game Commission was informed of the incident, Curci said.Budget vote June 24
The school board is expected June 24 to pass the district's $21.68 million budget for the 2013-14 school year.
The proposed budget calls for no property tax increase, but the tax rate in Indiana County will go up because of the method used to equalize taxes between the district's Armstrong and Indiana county communities.
In Armstrong County, the property tax rate would remain at 60.8 mills.
In Indiana County, it would increase by about 4 percent, from 161.4 mills to 167.7 mills.
The board will also approve lunch prices for the 2013-14 school year.
They are proposed to remain unchanged at $2.25 for elementary students and $2.50 for secondary students.
The board meets at 7 p.m. in the community room at Apollo-Ridge High School.
Brian C. Rittmeyer is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 724-226-4701 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
More Valley News Dispatch
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.