Burrell approves tax increase of about 2%
By Liz Hayes
Published: Wednesday, June 19, 2013, 12:31 a.m.
Burrell School Board on Tuesday unanimously approved a budget for the 2013-14 school year that increases real estate taxes by about 2 percent.
The $27 million spending plan decreased only slightly from the preliminary budget approved in May because of minute drops in the cost of special education and workers compensation, said Business Manager Jennifer Callahan.
The budget represents an increase of about 4 percent over the 2012-13 budget, which Callahan had attributed primarily to rising retirement costs plus contractual employee raises.
Property taxes will climb from 85.4 mills this school year to 87.2 mills next school year, a 1.8-mill increase.
The new tax rate would mean a hike of about $39 for the average homeowner.
Callahan said property owners who qualify for the homestead/farmstead exclusion — a tax rebate funded by state gambling revenue — will receive a credit of about $156 per home next year.
The budget was approved in a 6-0 vote; Directors Tom Klebine, John Marhefka and Linda Woiewodski were absent.
Although he had approved the preliminary budget, Klebine afterward had said he would have a difficult time approving the final budget if it included a tax increase.
He and Woiewodski, the two “no” votes a year ago on the 2012-13 budget that increased taxes, both referenced their disapproval of the early-bird teacher contract that was approved in 2010 and extends until 2016.
The contract offered average annual raises of about 4 percent, although all district employees later agreed to a wage freeze during the 2011-12 school year.
Liz Hayes is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 724-226-4680 or email@example.com.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Avonmore mayor files EEOC harassment case against council
- Alle-Kiski Valley schools better statewide scores
- Springdale officer who resigned to receive severance
- Judge allows evidence in case against New Ken-Arnold teacher