Police find burglary suspect's cellphone at Brackenridge crime scene
Police appreciate help in solving crimes — especially when it comes from a suspect.
That's what happened in a burglary incident over the weekend at a trailer owned by a contractor working on the new ATI-Allegheny Ludlum hot-strip mill.
The assist that police received apparently came from Tyler Jack, 19, of Sixth Avenue, Brackenridge, who was arrested Monday in connection with the burglary.
Brackenridge Patrolman Justin McIntire said that more than $7,000 worth of items ranging from power tools to a flat-screen TV and computers were taken from the trailer owned by McCarl's Services Inc., a heating, ventilation and air conditioning contractor.
The trailer was parked along Mile Lock Lane near the intersection with Third Avenue and showed no sign of forced entry.
But the investigation got a boost when McCarl's employees found a cellphone in the trailer and gave it to the police.
That break got even bigger, when police examined the phone, which they say belongs to Jack.
“The phone was on and it was on his Facebook page,” McIntire said.
Based on that evidence, he said, police obtained a search warrant for Jack's residence. When police conducted the search, they recovered all of the items that had been reported stolen, he said.
McIntire said Jack is charged with criminal trespass, theft, burglary, receiving stolen property — all felonies — and littering and prowling at night.
He was arraigned in Pittsburgh and placed in the Allegheny County Jail, police said.
Tom Yerace is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 724-226-4675 or email@example.com.
More Valley News Dispatch
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.