Tarentum heroin house raided
Police seized more than 4,000 packets of heroin and arrested three people in a morning raid on Friday at a Tarentum home.
Police said the drugs have a street value of $40,000.
Tarentum police Chief William Vakulick said police from Tarentum, Harrison and the state Attorney General's Drug Task Force served a search warrant about 6 a.m. at 614 Roup Ave.
Arrested were William Brown IV, 27, Djuan Williams, 33, and Carrie Schaub, 25, all of the Roup address. They were taken into custody without incident, Vakulick said.
Police said in court documents that what they found inside the house was consistent with packaging, distributing and selling heroin.
According to court documents, officers entered through the front door and found Williams, Brown and Schaub inside. Vakulick said they were taken into custody without incident.
Inside, officers found “a large amount of multiple bricks of heroin,” according to court documents. It explains that a brick contains 50 individual packets, called stamp bags, of heroin.
The heroin seized is believed to be worth about $40,000, Vakulick said.
“This one's a pretty big one,” the chief said.
In addition, police found a digital scale, a .22-caliber rifle and several rounds of ammunition. Vakulick said a sum of cash also was seized.
Charges against all three include criminal conspiracy, possession with intent to deliver and possession of drugs. Brown also is charged with a firearms offense; he is not allowed to have a gun because of a previous aggravated assault conviction.
All three were arraigned before Brackenridge District Judge Carolyn Bengel. Bonds for Brown and Williams were set at $100,000, while Schaub's bond was set at $50,000.
Preliminary hearings for all three were scheduled for July 3.
Brian C. Rittmeyer is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 724-226-4701 or email@example.com.
More Valley News Dispatch
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.