Paintballs strike cars in New Kensington
Reports of shots fired in a couple of New Kensington locations Thursday night were spot-on, sort of.
That's because what was being fired wasn't bullets but paintballs, police said.
Shortly before 10 p.m., police radio transmissions reported shots fired in the city's Hill neighborhood and also in the Westmoreland County housing complex near city hall at Fourth Avenue and 11th Street.
When police investigated they found that some cars had been hit by paintballs on Ridge Avenue and the 1300 block of Leishman Avenue, as well as Peach Court in the housing complex, according to city Detective Sgt. Dino DiGiacobbe.
A car being sought in the incident was pulled over by Lower Burrell and Tarentum police on Tarentum Bridge Road near Carl Avenue.
DiGiacobbe said it was one of a couple of vehicles whose occupants were shooting paintballs at cars. He also said there were reports of individuals on foot who were carrying paintball guns.
There were four young adults in the car and a search of the vehicle yielded a loaded paintball gun, he said.
DiGiacobbe said none of them were immediately arrested but charges are pending against them and possibly some other juveniles who were questioned by police.
He said police would review all the statements they collected before filing charges.
“Right now, the most we are looking at are misdemeanors,” DiGiacobbe said.
Tom Yerace is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 724-226-4675 or email@example.com.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.