Injured miners out of hospital; Kiski Twp. facility to remain closed
Two miners have been released from a hospital after they were injured in a rock fall Monday inside Rosebud's Tracy Lynne Mine in Kiski Township.
Rosebud Mining Co. of Kittanning, is not releasing the workers' names. State and federal officials investigating the accident said they do not have that information.
One miner was released from the hospital Monday night and the other man, who was kept overnight for observation, was released Tuesday morning, according to Jim Barker, a Rosebud vice president.
“They're banged up a bit, but nothing terribly serious,” Barker said.
The incident happened about 4:50 p.m. Monday when a chunk of rock — about 3 feet wide, 9 feet long and 3 inches thick — fell from between support pillars.
The men were 5 or 6 miles underground installing canvas used for ventilation when the accident occurred, said Joseph Sbaffoni, director of Bureau of Mine Safety, which is part of the state Department of Environmental Protection. The rock hit one miner in the knee and struck the other on his back, he said.
The mine shaft is about 4 feet high and miners must crawl on their hands and knees as they work.
John Poister, a spokesman for the state Department of Environmental Protection, said the Bureau of Mine Safety completed its on-scene investigation and is now analyzing the information.
“We're looking at whether the construction of the mine was set up so the pillars were supported properly and that when they did this, they did it in accordance with proper procedures,” Poister said.
The federal Mine Safety and Health Administration is also investigating.
The mine will not reopen until the agency completes its inquiry. A spokesman could not say when that would be.
Jodi Weigand is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 724-226-4702 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
More Valley News Dispatch
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.