ShareThis Page

Rothfus meets constituents for coffee in Fawn

| Thursday, July 4, 2013, 12:01 a.m.
U.S. Rep. Keith Rothfus speaks to constituents during a question and answer session at the Fawn Township municipal building on Wednesday, July 3, 2013.
Jason Bridge | Valley News Dispatch
U.S. Rep. Keith Rothfus speaks to constituents during a question and answer session at the Fawn Township municipal building on Wednesday, July 3, 2013.

Rep. Keith Rothfus is not satisfied with the government's response to several of the hot button topics in Washington these days.

“Nothing like this has ever been attempted before,” he said of 2009's Affordable Care Act. “No country in the world has ever attempted to micromanage the health care of 300 million people.

“We (Western Pennsylvania) have the largest participation in Medicare Advantage in the country,” he added. “Obamacare takes away from that. One of the things Obamacare does is, it prevents seniors who don't like the Medicare plan they picked, to pick a new plan.

“I introduced a new bill, with a congressman from Oregon, that would allow seniors to choose a new plan in the first three months if they don't like the one they picked.”

Rothfus, R-Sewickley, made the remarks at the Fawn municipal building during one of his “Coffee with Keith” meetings, the freshman congressman's program to meet with his constituents.

“Every congressman has about 700,000 bosses,” Rothfus joked, referring to his constituents. “The founders wanted the Congress to be representative of what the people want at the moment. I'm here to find out what's going on.”

Rothfus said he thought the recent immigration reform that was passed in the Senate was done too hastily.

“The bill that was passed in the Senate is a very dense piece of legislation,” he said. “The devil is always in the details.”

He's also unhappy with the nation's economic recovery.

Rothfus agrees the economy is recovering, but doesn't agree with President Obama's financial policies — which Rothfus said aren't growing the economy fast enough.

“This has been the worst economic recovery since the Great Depression,” he said. “During the recovery in the 1980s we added 1.1 million on jobs one month. We're scraping along at the bottom right now only adding 100,000 jobs-per-month. We need to be adding 400,000 a month.”

And his disappointment with the president doesn't stop there.

“You have a White House that, every time you approach them with policy, they throw a wet towel on it. What's the compromise? Half of a wet towel?”

Rothfus took questions from a group of about 10 constituents, then spoke one-on-one with anyone who wished at the end of the talk.

“I knew I wouldn't agree with most of the things he had to say, but I'm still glad he came out,” said George Erceg, 64, of Fawn. “I saw he was having some of these around (the district), but I didn't want to have to travel to Beaver.”

Fawn Supervisor Jason Davidek said anytime the township of about 2,300 people can have one-on-one time with a U.S. House member, it's a welcomed experience.

“I think, as a small township, this is a great opportunity,” Davidek said. “People in the township can have the ear of a federal official and he can understand our needs and concerns.”

R.A. Monti is a freelance reporter for Trib Total Media.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.