Penn Hills man waives charges of threatening to kill judge
A Penn Hills man accused of threatening to kill Harmar District Judge David Sosovicka waived the charges against him to court Wednesday.
According to a police complaint, Demetrius Williams, 24, of 149 E. Minister Drive, threatened to look up Sosovicka's home address on Google and “stab him in the chest 130 times.”
Williams is charged with three counts each of terroristic threats and harassment and a charge of disorderly conduct. A charge of retaliation against a prosecutor or judicial official was withdrawn.
Williams remains in the Allegheny County Jail in lieu of $1 million bond.
District Judge Elissa Lang in Sharpsburg heard the charges against Williams.
The alleged tirade against Sosovicka erupted while he was arraigning Williams in his court in Harmar on May 30 for charges filed by Harrison police, which included simple assault and disorderly conduct stemming from a separate incident.
Williams became “extremely outraged” in Sosovicka's courtroom and began to threaten the judge along with two state constables, who transported Williams from the Harrison Police station, according to the police complaint.
Williams proceeded to make death threats against all three men, according to the complaint.
As Williams threatened the men, he was removed from the courtroom and taken to a holding cell at Sosovicka's office, where, the police complaint states, he made more death threats against everyone involved in his arraignment process.
The complaint states that Williams continued to make the threats while he was transported to the Allegheny County Jail.
Mary Ann Thomas is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 724-226-4691 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.